What is Kritiks LD?
Kritiks are philosophically-based arguments which question fundamental assumptions underlying the arguments, positions, or presentation of one side in the debate. It looks at issues lurking within the presentation of one side of the debate, rather than taking the presentation at its face value.
How do you answer Kritiks in debate?
How to Answer Kritiks
- Perm (as you would a counterplan)
- No Link (as you would a disadvantage)
- Link Turn OR Impact Turn (as you would a disadvantage)
- Alt Can’t Solve (as you would a counterplan)
- Impact Defense (as you would a disadvantage)
- Kritik the Kritik (similar to presenting disadvantages to the counterplan)
What are Kritiks in debate?
Kritik. A kritik (from the German Kritik, meaning “critique” or “criticism”) is a form of argument in policy debate that challenges a certain mindset or assumption made by the opposing team, often from the perspective of critical theory.
What is AK AFF in debate?
A K aff criticizes an aspect of the squo (EX capitalism) and then discusses how the plan solves this problem. For example, a Cap K aff for living wage would say how the squo is really capitalistic and how this is the root cause of thermonuclear global extinction.
What are the four stock issues?
The standard “stock issues” presented as planks are Topicality, Inherency, Harms, and Solvency. Significance can be interwoven into any of those. Topicality is usually a simple matter to be argued later if the Negative brings up the issue.
How do you start a topicality?
In order to win a topicality argument, a negative needs to isolate one word or term in the resolution that the affirmative has not upheld in their interpretation of the resolution. Then, the negative needs to define that term. A definition can come from a variety of sources.
What is attitudinal Inherency?
Attitudinal inherency: Beliefs or attitudes which prevent the implementation of the plan or causing harms. Existential inherency: The harms exist and res ipsa loquitur, the status quo must not be able to solve the problem.
What are the four main parts of a topicality argument?
Topicality arguments are generally broken into four subpoints. They are: definition, standards, violation, and voting issues. In order to win a topicality argument, a negative needs to isolate one word or term in the resolution that the affirmative has not upheld in their interpretation of the resolution.
Why is topicality considered an a priori issue?
Topicality is an a priori issue for the affirmative: if they lose topicality, they lose the round. Therefore, negatives are able to run quick and usually inapplicable topicality arguments that the affirmative must now dedicate their own speech time to addressing.
How do you do a LD debate?
How Does LD Debate Work? In each preliminary round, one debater is assigned to defend the affirmative, and the other debater is assigned to defend the negative. During the course of the tournament, you will be forced to defend both the affirmative side and the negative side many times.
What is a low point win?
Low-Point Win – When the winning debater has lower speaker points than the losing debater.
What is a kritik in law?
The kritik is generally presented as an absolute argument. It demands a yes-or-no response from the judge, rather than an impact which is weighed against other arguments. The kritik may be non-unique. The side presenting a kritik may indulge in the same “hidden assumptions” for which it is kritiking the opposing team.
Is theory here to stay in LD debate?
Theory is one of the most technical arguments in debate and has been on the rise in recent years throughout the LD circuit. For better or worse, it’s here to stay and theory will continue to be prevalent.
What is the result of a kritik debate?
The result of this is that the debate shifts away from policy discussion, often toward discussing questions of fact or value. The kritik is generally presented as an absolute argument. It demands a yes-or-no response from the judge, rather than an impact which is weighed against other arguments.
What are the characteristics of a successful Kritik?
Authorities suggest that successful kritiks have five characteristics: The kritik questions the fundamental assumptions of the round. It looks at issues lurking within the presentation of one side of the debate, rather than taking the presentation at its face value.