What was the ruling in Jacobson v United States?
No. In a majority decision authored by Justice Byron R. White, the Court determined that, the prosecution was unable to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Jacobson was inclined to commit the criminal act of purchasing child pornography independent of government interference.
What was Keith Jacobson charged with?
Child Pornography
| Charge: | “Child Pornography (Possession, Manufacture, or Dissemination)” |
|---|---|
| Conviction Caused By: | Entrapped by federal agents. |
Who is Keith Jacobson?
Keith Jacobson, a 56-year-old farmer, had been charged with receiving child pornography. The agents had pursued him for more than two years before he finally subscribed to a pornographic magazine, “Boys Who Love Boys.” In the raid on his farmhouse, agents found only the pornography that they had sent him.
What is the significance of the United States v Wade case in the way law enforcement conducts investigations?
Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that a criminal defendant has a Sixth Amendment right to counsel at a lineup held after indictment.
What is a Jacobson remand?
Unlike the Page 6 2 typical remand, in a Jacobson remand the district court cannot reconsider the underlying sentence and the Second Circuit retains jurisdiction over the appeal during the remand.
What has the Court said in US v Wade about problems with identification procedures?
The Court held that the identifications should not be excluded if they were based on observations other than the lineup. Justice Hugo L. Justice Abe Fortas concurred in part and dissented in part, stating that the lineup violated Wade’s privilege against self-incrimination.
How was Roe v Wade decided?
On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision in favor of Norma McCorvey (“Jane Roe”) holding that women in the United States had a fundamental right to choose whether or not to have abortions without excessive government restriction and striking down Texas’s abortion ban as unconstitutional.
What two things are required to prove that the totality of circumstances for an involuntary confession?
Whether a confession is involuntary must be determined by considering the totality of the circumstances – the characteristics of the defendant and the environment and technique of interrogation.
In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the accused must be provided with counsel during post-indictment lineups?
Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , this Court held “that a post-indictment pretrial lineup at which the accused is exhibited to identifying witnesses is a critical stage of the criminal prosecution; that police conduct of such a lineup without notice to and in the absence of his counsel …
What was the legal problem with Miranda’s confession?
At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury. Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.