What does Thrasymachus say about justice?
What, he says, is Thrasymachus’ definition of justice? Thrasymachus says that he will provide the answer if he is provided his fee. He then says that justice is whatever is in the interest of the stronger party in a given state; justice is thus effected through power by people in power.
What does sophist Thrasymachus claim justice to be?
According to this interpretation, Thrasymachus is a relativist who denies that justice is anything beyond obedience to existing laws. Thrasymachus therefore turns out to be an ethical egoist who stresses that justice is the good of another and thus incompatible with the pursuit of one’s self-interest.
Why does Socrates disagree with Thrasymachus?
Unlike Thrasymachus, Socrates does not believe that the city and the ruler’s main goal and interest are money or power. Socrates does not promote injustice like Thrasymachus as he believes a city will not function without necessary wisdom, and virtue which can only be found when justice occurs.
What does Socrates argue about justice?
Socrates takes the basic challenge to concern how justice relates to the just person’s objective success or happiness (Greek eudaimonia). In Book One, he argued that justice, as a virtue, makes the soul perform its function well and that a person who lives well is “blessed and happy” (352d–354a, quoting 354a1).
What is Thrasymachus view of justice and injustice?
Thrasymachus makes three statements regarding justice: 1) justice is “nothing other than the advantage of the stronger” (338c); 2) justice is obeying the laws of the ruler(s) (339b); 3) justice is “really someone else’s good, the advantage of the man who is stronger and rules” (343c).
What does Thrasymachus say about perfect justice and perfect injustice How does Socrates respond?
Thrasymachus offers his definition of justice in a similar vein. Though Socrates and Thrasymachus agree that justice is beneficial, they disagree about whom it benefits. Socrates thinks that justice, like any character virtue, benefits its possessor: my being just makes my life better.
Does Socrates refute Thrasymachus?
Thrasymachus agrees to this, and also to Socrates’ claim that a craftsperson is wise and good, which makes sense at least with respect to the craft in question….The Outdoing Argument (1.348b–350d)
| Socrates: | Do you call one of the two a virtue and the other a vice? |
|---|---|
| Thrasymachus: | I certainly do. (1.348c–e) |
How does Socrates respond to Thrasymachus definition of justice?
Though Socrates and Thrasymachus agree that justice is beneficial, they disagree about whom it benefits. Socrates thinks that justice, like any character virtue, benefits its possessor: my being just makes my life better.
How does Socrates respond to Thrasymachus?
When Thrasymachus first tells Socrates that justice is “the advantage of the stronger (Plato 1991, 338c),” Socrates responds that, according to this argument, everyone should eat beef if this is what is good for the strongest wrestler. Thrasymachus bursts out, “You are disgusting, Socrates.
How does Socrates refute Thrasymachus definition of justice?
Thrasymachus sings the praises of the art of rulership, which Thrasymachus sees as an expertise in advancing its possessor’s self-interest at the expense of the ruled. So Socrates tries to refute Thrasymachus by proving that it is justice rather than injustice that has the features of a genuine expertise. (
What is Thrasymachus view of justice quizlet?
What is Thrasymachus’ definition of justice? He follows the Sophists’ line of thinking. Justice is the advantage of the stronger. The rulers define justice as to whatever is to their benefit.
What is the position of Thrasymachus on Justice?
The position Thrasymachus takes on the definition of justice, as well as its importance in society, is one far differing from the opinions of the other interlocutors in the first book of Plato’s Republic.
What is the difference between Cephalus and Polemarchus’ definition of Justice?
In this paper, the author highlighted the dispute witnessed in the dialogue between Socrates, Cephalus, and Polemarchus. Cephalus’ view of justice represents the outlook of an established and elderly business person. On the other hand, Polemarchus’ definition reflects the thoughts of a young politician.
What is Polemarchus’ view of reciprocity?
Basic ideas: 332a-332b, 334e (State in sentence form.) Polemarchus’ view is a common view illustrated by a lot of human conduct, as well as many of the actions of the gods and heroes in Greek mythology. It involves the notion of reciprocity or “pay back.”
Why did Socrates find Cephalus and Polemarchus’s views on Justice unsatisfactory?
Another reason why Socrates found Cephalus and Polemarchus’ views unsatisfactory is because they did not define the nature of justice itself. Socrates explained the concept of working towards what is naturally best suited to the welfare of the community.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc-N-z6P4Fg