What is the danger of fundamentalism?
Religious fundamentalism is bad for your health. There are, of course, the ill effects suffered by suicide bombers and their innocent victims. Consider also the sarin gas attacks by the Aum Shinrikyo (Supreme Truth) sect, which killed 12 people in the Tokyo subway in 1995, and sickened 1,000 more.
What was the main argument of fundamentalism?
The central theme of The Fundamentals was that the Bible is the inerrant word of God. Associated with this idea was the view that the Bible should be read literally whenever possible and that believers should lead their lives according to the moral precepts it contains, especially the Ten Commandments.
What were fundamentalists against?
Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the “fundamentals of belief” against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself.
How did fundamentalism affect society in the 1920s?
Every immigrant was seen as an enemy fundamentalism clashed with the modern culture in many ways. The modern culture encouraged more freedom for young people and women. Fundamentalists thought consumerism relaxed ethics and that the changing roles of women signaled a moral decline.
Does religion cause brain damage?
A study published in the journal Neuropsychologia has shown that religious fundamentalism is, in part, the result of a functional impairment in a brain region known as the prefrontal cortex. Fundamentalist groups generally oppose anything that questions or challenges their beliefs or way of life.
What are fundamentalists beliefs?
Religious fundamentalists believe in the superiority of their religious teachings, and in a strict division between righteous people and evildoers (Altemeyer and Hunsberger, 1992, 2004). This belief system regulates religious thoughts, but also all conceptions regarding the self, others, and the world.
What is an example of fundamentalism?
Fundamentalism is defined as strict adherence to some belief or ideology, especially in a religious context, or a form of Christianity where the Bible is taken literally and obeyed in full. When a person follows every possible rule of the Bible, both literal and implied, this is an example of fundamentalism.
What was the conflict between fundamentalists and those who accepted evolution?
What was the conflict between fundamentalists and those who accepted evolution? That fundamentalists believed it was God who made the humans and everything, but those who accepted evolution believed in the Darwin’s theory of evolution that humans evolved from apes. People would be rebellious against the law against it.
Does religion shrink the brain?
A number of studies have evaluated the acute effects of religious practices, such as meditation and prayer, on the human brain. The results showed significantly greater hippocampal atrophy in individuals reporting a life-changing religious experience.
What is American fundamentalism?
The story of American fundamentalism is the story of those nineteenth-century American mainstream Protestants and their heirs who arose to defend traditional evangelical doctrine in light of cultural, intellectual, and ecclesiastical change in American society and religion.
Is the fate of fundamentalism in historiography worse than history?
Ernest Sandeen’s statement that “the fate of Fundamentalism in historiography has been worse than its lot in history” no longer holds true. Fundamentalist historiography has blossomed since Sandeen’s 1970 work and George Marsden’s Fundamentalism and American Culture, which appeared in 1980.
Is fundamentalism a rearguard against progress?
In that sense, what is often called “fundamentalism” is a creation of modernity; it is not a rearguard effort to turn back progress, but a form of resistance only possible in a secular, technologically advanced world. Beyond these broad similarities, however, the terrain becomes difficult.
Was there a “fourth phase of fundamentalism?
There were also separatist fundamentalists before the “fourth phase” of fundamentalism, which this paper argues got underway in 1960. Furthermore, the ministries of fundamentalists like William Bell Riley, Carl McIntire, John R. Rice, R. A. Torrey and C. I. Scofield transcend any one phase.