What is the fallacy of equivocation example?
The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument. Examples: I have the right to watch “The Real World.” Therefore it’s right for me to watch the show.
What is the fallacy of equivocation and how can it be used to persuade an audience that a conclusion is true?
The fallacy of equivocation occurs whenever a word has one meaning in one premise and another meaning in another premise or the conclusion. Claims are guilty by association.
What are some examples of equivocate?
Equivocate is defined as to use vague language in order to mislead or deceive. An example of equivocate is a teenage girl telling her parents she’s staying the night at a friend’s house, when really she’s staying at her boyfriend’s house.
What do you mean by equivocation?
Definition of equivocation : deliberate evasiveness in wording : the use of ambiguous or equivocal language Like any good teacher, he does his best to answer with clarity and minimal equivocation.—
Is reductio ad absurdum a logical fallacy?
Reductio ad absurdum is not a fallacy. Rather, RAA is correct reasoning that exposes a fallacy. From the Logically Fallacious page for it: [RAA is a] mode of argumentation or a form of argument in which a proposition is disproven by following its implications logically to an absurd conclusion….
How do you recognize equivocation?
Equivocation is the deliberate use of vague or ambiguous language, with the intent of deceiving others or avoiding commitment to a specific stance. For example, when a person is asked a direct yes-or-no question, and gives a vague response that doesn’t answer the question, that person is equivocating.
What does equivocate mean mean?
Definition of equivocate intransitive verb. 1 : to use equivocal language especially with intent to deceive. 2 : to avoid committing oneself in what one says.