Who was involved in the former Yugoslavia tribunal?
Over its 25 years, the ICTY Processed 151 defendants, including 95 Serbs, 29 Croats and 9 Bosnian Muslims, as well as a handful of Kosovo Albanians, Montenegrins and Macedonians, and a few of unknown ethnicity. One defendant was a woman: Bosnian Serb prime minister Biljana Plavsic.
What do the Yugoslavia and Rwanda International Criminal Tribunals have in common?
The Trial Chambers of both the ICTY and the ICTR have not only drawn attention to the crime of rape, but they have also proven that rape is an international crime. Rape was prosecuted and sentenced for the first time under several international core crimes (chapeau crimes).
Why were the ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda established by Security Council resolutions?
The United Nations established ad hoc international criminal tribunals in Yugoslavia and Rwanda to prosecute those responsible for genocide, war crimes, and other atrocities and serious humanitarian violations in those particular conflicts.
How many persons were convicted for crimes against humanity or war crimes from the former Yugoslavia?
A total of 161 persons were indicted in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)….List of indictees.
Name | Banović, Predrag | |
---|---|---|
Status | Sentenced by ICTY | |
Case name | Omarska and Keraterm Camps | |
Final judgement | Sentence | 8 years (Pleaded guilty.) |
Date | 28 October 2003 |
Is the ICTY part of the ICC?
The tribunal was an ad hoc court located in The Hague, Netherlands. It was established by Resolution 827 of the United Nations Security Council, which was passed on 25 May 1993….
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia | |
---|---|
Website | www.icty.org |
When was the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia?
May 1993
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia | |
---|---|
Established | 25 May 1993 |
Dissolved | 31 December 2017 |
Location | The Hague, Netherlands |
Coordinates | 52.0944°N 4.2843°ECoordinates:52.0944°N 4.2843°E |
Who establishes international tribunals?
The principal international criminal tribunals that have operated to prosecute individuals for serious violations of international criminal law or international humanitarian law – such as war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity – are those established by the United Nations.
How many Serbs were convicted of war crimes?
The list contains 161 names. 94 of these are Serbs, 29 are Croats, 9 are Albanians, 9 are Bosniaks, 2 are Macedonians and 2 are Montenegrins….List of indictees.
Name | Babić, Milan | |
---|---|---|
Allegiance | Republic of Serb Krajina | |
Status | Sentenced by ICTY | |
Case name | RSK | |
Final judgement | Sentence | 13 years (Pleaded guilty.) |
What was the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia?
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) was a United Nations court of law that dealt with war crimes that took place during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s. During its mandate, which lasted from 1993 – 2017, it irreversibly changed the landscape of international humanitarian law,
What is the war crimes chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The War Crimes Chamber (WCC) in Bosnia and Herzegovina was established in March 2005 in response to the winding up of the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY). The WCC was designed to try lower and mid-level perpetrators referred to it by the ICTY and locally initiated cases.
What was the first year of the International Criminal Tribunal?
1993–1994: In the first year of its existence, the Tribunal laid the foundations for its existence as a judicial organ. The Tribunal established the legal framework for its operations by adopting the rules of procedure and evidence, as well as its rules of detention and directive for the assignment of defense counsel.
Who created the International Court of Arbitration for Yugoslavia?
The Court was originally proposed by German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel. By 25 May 1993, the international community had tried to pressure the leaders of the former Yugoslavian republics diplomatically, militarily, politically, economically, and – with Resolution 827 – through juridical means.