What is the difference between retributive and utilitarian approaches to punishment?
Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies: utilitarian and retributive. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or “deter,” future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.
What is the retributive theory of punishment?
Retributive justice is a theory of punishment that when an offender breaks the law, justice requires that they suffer in return, and that the response to a crime is proportional to the offence. However, the judgment of whether a punishment is appropriately severe can vary greatly across cultures and individuals.
What are the two types of retributive theory of punishment?
The retributive theory assumes that the punishment is given only for the sake of it. Thus, it suggests that evil should be returned for evil without taking into consideration any consequences. There are two theories in which this theory can be divided further. They are specific deterrence and general deterrence.
What is the difference between Retributivist and utilitarian rewards?
Retributive justice punishes law-breakers because they deserve to be punished for breaking the law. Utilitarian justice seeks to create the greatest benefit to society through punishment by deterring crime and rehabilitating criminals.
What are the theories of criminal punishment?
The theories of punishment are as follows:
- RETRIBUTIVE THEORY.
- DETERRENT THEORY.
- PREVENTIVE THEORY.
- INCAPACITATION THEORY.
- COMPENSATORY THEORY.
- REFORMATIVE THEORY.
- UTILITIRIAN THEORY.
Who gave the retributive theory of punishment?
Immanuel Kant
[16] Immanuel Kant, ‘The Retributive Theory of Punishment’ in (eds), The Philosophy of Law (1st, , 1887).
What is the purpose of retribution punishment?
Retribution. Retribution prevents future crime by removing the desire for personal avengement (in the form of assault, battery, and criminal homicide, for example) against the defendant.