What is vagueness of theory?
According to this theory, a vague statement is true if it is true on at least one precisification and false if it is false under at least one precisification. If a vague statement comes out true under one precisification and false under another, it is both true and false.
Who came up with the sorites paradox?
1. The Sorites in History. The Megarian philosopher Eubulides (4th century BC) is usually credited with the first formulation of the puzzle. (The name ‘sorites’ derives from the Greek word soros, meaning ‘heap’.)
What are the types of vagueness?
The prevalent theories of vagueness can be divided into three categories, paralleling three logical interpretations of borderline cases: (i) a borderline case is a case of a truth-value gap; it is neither true nor false; (ii) a borderline case is a case of a truth-value glut; it is both true and false; and (iii) a …
How do you use vagueness?
We had only a vague idea of where we were. I think I have a vague understanding of how it works. He longed in some vague way for something different. She felt a vague sense of uneasiness when she was around him.
What constitutes a heap?
1 : a collection of things thrown one on another : pile. 2 : a great number or large quantity : lot. heap. verb. heaped; heaping; heaps.
What is the difference between ambiguity and vagueness?
Ambiguity exists when a term can reasonably be interpreted in more than one way, for example, the word “bank” can refer to a financial institution or a riverside. Vagueness occurs when the boundaries of a word’s meaning are not well defined, as in the word “tall”5.
What is vagueness in critical thinking?
Vagueness in critical thinking is an unclear situation with insufficient details given. For example, if we were asked to describe one particular person who we met for the first time, we will describe looking for the person. Another simple example of vagueness is ‘there are many people in the concert last night’.
How do you put Sorite in standard form?
A sorites is in standard form when all terms have been paired and when the predicate of the conclusion is the predicate of the first premise.